Thank you Josh, for sharing this about Samuel Smiles on Google.
I could basically copy and paste the entire article, because it was just that good, but I will refrain. Here is one of my favorite passages from the article, written by Lawrence W. Reed.
The welfare state was anathema to Smiles. He felt it was a woefully ineffective substitute for personal charity. “The value of legislation as an agent in human advancement has usually been much over-estimated,” he wrote. “No laws, however stringent, can make the idle industrious, the thriftless provident, or the drunken sober.” What he said about poverty legislation a century and a half ago would be a fitting description of the results of the welfare programs of today:
Amazing how people from the 1800's can have such perspective and their words can give insight into events happening now.We have tried to grapple with the evils of [misery] by legislation, but it seems to mock us. Those who sink into poverty are fed, but they remain paupers. Those who feed them feel no compassion; and those who are fed return no gratitude. There is no bond of sympathy between the givers and the receivers.
No comments:
Post a Comment